Research Critique and PICOT Statement Rough Draft

Question Description

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, Benchmark – Research Critique and PICOT Statement Rough Draft. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions and submit your final draft of 1,500-1,750 words.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubic

Research Critique and PICOT Statement Final Draft 

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%
2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%
3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%
4
Good 80-89%
89.00%
5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
65.0 %Content
3.0 % Research Problem and PurposeThe research problem or purpose of study is not mentioned.There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem.The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate.The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing.The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing is addressed.
3.0 % Research Objective, Questions, or HypothesesThe research objective, questions, or hypotheses are not mentioned. Does not mention research objective, questions or hypotheses.There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses.The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate.The research objective, questions, or hypotheses are described and related to study methods.Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.
3.0 % Literature ReviewLiterature review is not mentioned.There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review.The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study.The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described.The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.
3.0 %Conceptual/Theoretical Framework – QualitativeThe conceptual/theoretical framework is not mentioned.There are some inaccuracies in describing the conceptual/theoretical framework.The conceptual/theoretical framework elements are present and mostly accurate.The conceptual/theoretical framework is described.The conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.
3.0 % Protection of Human ParticipantsProtection of human participants is not critiqued.Some of the study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are not addressed for quantitative design.The study tools are critiqued. Ethical issues are discussed for quantitative design.The study tools are critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.The study tools are thorough, clear and accurately critiqued using research terminology. Ethical issues are addressed for quantitative design.
3.0 % Data CollectionData collection methods are not critiqued.Data collection methods are critiqued, but not to the full extent or not including ethical issues.Data collection methods and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview or data collection processes are presented.Data collection methods are critiqued and potential biases are reviewed. Ethical issues are described. Interview or data collection processes are critiqued.Data collection methods are fully critiqued, and potential biases are addressed. Potential ethical issues, interview or data collection processes are critiqued.
5.0 % Problem Statement in PICOT FormatNo problem statement is provided.The critique of the problem statement is provided, but is missing criteria as indicated in the writing guidelines. There are some inaccuracies describing the elements associated with the PICOT statement.The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines. The PICOT is present and most of the elements and description are mostly accurate.The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner. The PICOT statement is described and related to the research question or problem of the study.The critique of the problem statement meets all criteria of the writing guidelines in a detailed and comprehensive manner while demonstrating deeper understanding by incorporating prior learning or thoughtful reflection. The PICOT statement is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with the description of the research question or problem of the study.
3.0 % Data Analysis or Data ManagementData analysis or management is not critiqued.Data analysis is described. Significance and nonsignificance are explained; generalization and implications to nursing practice are not fully addressed. Conclusions are vague.Data analysis is described and linked to research questions. Results are explained, and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are presented.Data analysis is critiqued and tied to research questions. Results are explained. Generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study.Data analysis is accurately critiqued and linked to research questions. Significance and nonsignificance are explained. Generalization and implications to nursing practice are reviewed. Conclusions are tied back to purpose of study and literature review.
6.0 % Implications for Practice and Future ResearchThe quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are not addressed.The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are mentioned but not fully addressed.The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained.The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained with specific suggestions mentioned.The quality of the study and implications for nursing practice and future research are addressed and explained in detail, including specific suggestions.
3.0 % ConclusionConclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and applicability of findings.Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to nursing.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the findings to nursing practice.
 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"